Welcome to Lost Bets.

Home of the Best Videos for Strip Game fans on the internet.
Please visit our CLIP STORE to check out our ever-growing collection of videos! Or view our cheesy bare-bones HTML EPISODE GUIDE


Our sister site LOSTBETSGAMES.COM features a collection of our clips for one low price!

Can't get enough? Check out LOST BETS B-SIDES for even more sexy games!

Friday, June 25, 2010

The saga of Episode 164 (or: PN, gb, this one's for you.)

As I type this, Episode 164 ("Strip Bender with Camilla, Taylor, and Nicole") is nearly four hours late. It's gonna be a little while, because it's still encoding. The encoding is taking abnormally long because the video is abnormally long too: over 40 minutes. I hope Clips4Sale lets me sell it at a reasonable price. And a Premiere fuckup meant I had to throw out the result of the first 9-hour render and start over. Which is why it's late. I hope it'll be published before midnight so I can at least say I didn't slip a day.

Why this sudden rush job at the last minute to have a clip ready to publish on Friday? Because this was a last-minute addition to the calendar. Thanks to the advocacy of blog commenters PN and gb, this episode was rushed into production. If you think these three girls are cute, get ready: for the first time ever on lostbets.com, the losers of a game will go All The Way. Hope you think it's worth the wait.

UPDATE: The HD version is now live! Made it with 45 minutes to spare.

28 comments:

Anonymous said...

Red,

First, thanks for actually listening to my comments and going out of your way to make this happen as requested.

Second, i don't know if it's a problem with the video or my specific download but i can't track around in the video. I always check to make sure that the last minute or so is there because of a bad download in the past, but in this case two different video players stopped working after i moved the slider. In both cases, the video seemed to pause but with no way to make it start playing again.

Finally, the video was great. The only feedback i could give on it is that if you do this game again, set a prompt time limit on moving hands/feet because one player sure took their time on this one. The others would be bent into pretzels and she's stand there analyzing her next move and taking her time while they tire out.

PN

Anonymous said...

this was the best one yet.

loved it.
only thing to make it better would be blind folds/handcuffs or something like that.

it seems like the losers were not at all uneager to be losers.
maybe one loser, while the two winners talk smack while she does two guys?
that would be fun.

CA Fan

Anonymous said...

How does someone go about nominating a video for an AVN award?

-Zippo

Red said...

PN: Glad you liked it. Sorry about the problem seeking within the video... I noticed the same problem in Windows Media Player myself, and it baffled me. There's nothing different about the way this video was encoded than any other. Perhaps it has something to do with the large size of the file, but I've used seek in WMP on much longer videos, so that doesn't seem likely. I can seek okay (although still slowly) in VLC Media Player. I'll try to figure out what the issue is before next week.

CA fan: blindfolds, handcuffs, excellet ideas. Will use 'em next time. As for the lack of uneagerness, you're right... in fact, one of the losers seemed positively giddy when she saw what Dante was packing. It's a tricky problem... it's hard to find girls who'd be willing to have sex if they lose, but are still reluctant to do so. As for one loser getting double-teamed by the guys, have you been sneaking looks at my portfolio?? On film, waiting to be edited.

Zippo: Now that's a hell of a compliment. Thank you! I don't know how the AVN nomination process works, but I think I'll find out.

Anonymous said...

Great video, more like this please.

Any news on whether we will see Julie in any new videos soon?

Marcus

Anton said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

Red,

BEST.VIDEO.YET.

This was epic, beyond epic. You've ventured into a new realm of awesomeness! There must be more videos like this one! My heart was pounding the whole time! Great build-up, awesome sex scene.
Keep em' coming!!

Anonymous said...

While I enjoyed the video, I think the lack of embarassment took a little away from it (very little, but still a little)... I think if you were to play a game with 8 to 10 girls, and play to only one or two losers, you might be able to convince a shyer girl to play to this kind of forfeit, knowing the odds of actually losing are slimmer. That way, a Julie (obviously one of my faves) or similarly shy girl would be embarassed by losing, and make for a better payoff.

Just a thought, and of course, a hope of some true embarassment...

Matt

Mark said...

i did like the vidio but Johnes laughing has got to go

Red said...

@Marcus: I'm afraid I've been lax in getting in touch with Julie... had a lot on my plate. I'll try to correct that soon.

@Anon 6/26 πPM: Thanks! Glad you liked this one, and I'm always happy to hear compliments, but could you please sign your posts? Just pick a name and stick with it.

@Matt (and a few others who emailed me): It's a tough problem, finding girls who'd be willing to take part in a game when sex is part of the equation but be shy and embarrassed about it. Bettering the odds by increasing the number of players doesn't really help. I mean, think about it: would you play in a stripping game where the loser got fucked in the ass by a guy? What if you were one of 8-10 players, and only 1-2 would lose, would that convince you to play? Not me... and not most girls, either.

But I'm working on the problem. I've come up with some good ideas (and received quite a few via email and this blog) for having games with really hardcore forfeits and yet embarrass the loser.

By the way: next week's update just might be hotter.

Anonymous said...

i just keep thinking about Kat's embarassment in YBYA.
she was willing to risk it, but when she lost, the blushing was obvious.

and what made that vid so good.

of course, maybe it was not the act as much as the size of the live audience?

CA Fan

Jace said...

Nice videos; just a random thought that struck me for a nice revenge video if any of the girls wants to get revenge. I mean Amber must still be pissed about her latest lose. So why not take advantage of it and create it loser takes a strap-on by the winner? Either anally or normally depending on how far you want the video to go.

Anonymous said...

Hey Red
This last video was awesome to say the least and the girls are extremely cute, but I was wondering what are the odds of all-time greats like Ashley, Amber or
Candle doing a video and the forefeit be to give it all up as in this video. No matter how great the new girls are, I still would love to see some of these past
performers in a similar video.

Anonymous said...

red,

I might not be willing to take it in the ass from a guy, but if I had a good chance of getting to screw one of those girls, or if I lost, getting strapon'ed by all 3 of them, I'd take my chances.

not_signing_this_one

Anonymous said...

Decent point there. The guys are rarely risking anything in the harder forfeits. I am fervently hetero, mind you, but having the guys potentially risking something significant would make the games much hotter.

JW

Red said...

CA Fan: Kat (or Naomi or Amber Heavens) is a very special case. Not only does she hate to lose, but she's got such a high opinion of herself that she can't imagine losing, at least when skill's involved. This makes her an excellent loser :) And yeah, the live studio audience probably didn't hurt. It's a bit of a logistical challenge to round up a studio audience, but I've done it once, I ought to do it again.

Jace: Excellent. I'll talk to recent losers to ask if they want revenge.

Anon 10:25: (please sign your posts!) That, too, is an excellent idea. I'll call some of the "classic" girls and see if they'd be up for some higher stakes.

NotSigning: Never mind what you would do, the point is that there's stuff you wouldn't do. Would you take the chance of fucking one of the girls if there were, say, a one-in-four chance you'd get multiple cocks up the ass? Point is, everyone has lines they won't even risk crossing.

JW: Just as an aside, I think it's kind of a pity that people feel the need to assert their heterosexuality when saying things like that. As a fantasy, two guys trying to get some girls in a compromising position but instead ending up humiliating themselves while the girls laugh is pretty hot, and I think you can appreciate that whether you're straight or gay. The video just published features not one but two ejaculating cocks, and I doubt that looking at either of them turned anybody gay. NTTAWWT.

I've put guys in a position to lose before. But now that we're venturing into more dangerous territory, maybe it's time to bring the boys back in as players.

Anonymous said...

hey red just wondering when the standard version of this video is coming?

Anonymous said...

usa88

Red said...

It came and went... turns out there was an audio glitch in the standard version which caused it to be silent for the last three minutes or so. I'm re-encoding it now but will probably be asleep before it's done. I'll get a fixed standard version up tomorrow.

Rolo said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Red said...

Rolo--
No offense, my friend, but I deleted your comment, because it was spoileriffic, and I prefer not to have spoilers appear on the blog for at least a week after a clip is first published. I saved your post and will restore it after it's been a week. I'm also writing a reply, which I'll post at that time. In the future, comments like yours would be very welcome via email if you don't want to wait a week.

All--
I'm encoding 165 as we speak. I'll probably post it early.

kkman112 said...

Awesome. Just. Awesome! :)

UK Reader said...

Any news on an old video of London you mentioned a few weeks ago or the return of Derek also mentioned a while ago? They are certainly favourites of mine that I can't wait to see again.
Thanks.

Anonymous said...

Red, fair point. It took me a while, but I figured out what NTTAWWT meant. LOL'd when I did.

JW

Red said...

kkman: Thanks! I'm glad you think so.

UK Reader: D'oh! I'd completely forgotten that London clip. Thanks for reminding me. I'll look for it soon, promise. (The video footage is on a no-longer-usable hard drive, so I need to dig up the tape and re-capture it. Fortunately it's old enough that I was only using one camera rather than the four I use now, so editing will be a piece of cake.) As for Derek... I just got those through editing and they're in the final stages of post-production. Look for 'em before the end of July.

JW: :)

Anonymous said...

I've noticed the last several videos have had some problems with whatever you're using for deinterlacing producing wavy lines. You might try some different deinterlacing settings or another tool for deinterlacing. Handbrake does a really good job for that sort of thing (and for encoding in general as well)

M42

LoveShyGirls said...

Hi Red,
I liked that video
Some comments:

1. I would have expected that both guys would have sex with both girls.
So it seems both girls are having sex with their boy friends.

2. The boys should work on their cumshots. And I'd like to have to have a closeup of the girl's faces after the cumshots (you know men like those things)

3. I also like the idea with the handcuffs.

Anonymous said...

Red,

This is what I've been waiting for. Awesome job, man.

The double team sounds even better.

Still have a question, though: why is all the best stuff on Clips? Why not your pay site?

Keep it up! And, thanks...