Two new videos have been added to the store. Pettles and Elora are back for a rematch, and new girls Tristen and Stephanie make their debut. Enjoy.
Also, check out the new poll in the sidebar on this blog. Make your opinion known!
The call for help is this: I need a banner ad. Or more than one banner ad. And I suck at art. I'm hoping that someone who's creative and good at art will answer my call...
IMPORTANT NOTE about the Tristen and Stephanie clip: Certain versions of Apple's QuickTime Player for Windows have a bug and won't play a clip with a filename longer than 63 characters. If you're having this problem, you can try using a different media player or renaming the clip. I apologize to those who've had problems.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
7 comments:
Hey everything looks good Red!!! wish i could buy but being a college student things are tight so i just keep waiting around but Everything does look Great!!! keep up the good work
Really liked the Tristen and Stephanie video - looks like it will be a series in the same theme, which sounds like a lot of fun...I particularly like the sorority that they're pledging (Rho Epsilon Delta). :-)
It's been said before but the vids are much too expensive. However, I love the strip game concept and wanted to support the site. So I went and bought one. (Just one mind you - generosity goes only so far.)
I bought Ashton, Mia and Ashley play strip memory. Here's my report... The girls are cute. The game result could not have been better even if you scripted it. The girls weren't that reluctant to strip. However they clearly preferred winning so that's something.
The application of oil was a great idea for a forfeit. Although I enjoyed it, I thought the way they did it was a bit tame. There was a lost opportunity for more queezing instead of gently smearing. Also arms tended to get in the way of the view. Good first attempt at a touching forfeit.
While I'm at it, here's feedback based just off descriptions and pictures on the shop... Firstly, a twirl hardly counts as a forfeit. Losers of all games should do a twirl but it doesn't need to be dwelled on. Secondly, be somewhat selective with your models. You want them to believable "girls next door" but they should still be attractive. For me Pettles and Elora don't make the grade. Glad to see you running a poll. Please learn from it.
Well done. I'll be back when the price is right.
Please don't make twirls mandatory. It kind of breaks any sense of fantasy when every single strip game I've paid for on the internet includes a twirl. Have the girls get up and walk away to see their backsides or pull their panties down facing away from the camera. The worst thing you could do in my opinion is stick to the same formula for every shoot.
Twirls are good. We want to see something for the money we are paying. That being said do change it up a little. Jumping jacks or rubbing oil were good (next time I recomend a full body rub down on the oil). For other ideas look at the other striping sites, for ideas like standing for pictures, going nude, getting clothes stolen, becoming waitress or slave for the winer, etc.
Webmaster: Please clairify what is meant when you say your movies do not contain any sexual content and thus are exempt from 18 USC 2257? Also why not get a bit more sexual?
Sure, I'll be happy to. Section 2257 of Title 18 of the United States Code pertains to recordkeeping requirements for the producers of adult-oriented content. Subsection (a) requires that everybody who produces "any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, or other matter which contains one or more visual depictions made after November 1, 1990 of actual sexually explicit conduct" create and maintain records of every performer. I absolutely do not have a problem with that. I've kept records about everybody who's ever appeared in one of my videos.
Subsection (b) requires those producers to "ascertain, by examination of an identification document containing such information, the performer’s name and date of birth." I absolutely don't have a problem with that, either. I scrupulously checked to make sure that everybody who's been in front of my camera is over 18.
Subsection (c) requires that producers make this information available to law enforcement, which again I have no problem with. If somebody shows up at my door with a subpoena, I'll be more than happy to provide my records. Subsection (d) talks about how that information may be used. No problems there.
Subsection (e) is where things get sticky. It requires the content producers to include "a statement describing where the records required by this section with respect to all performers depicted in that copy of the matter may be located." It also says that the description of where the records are located must include the recordkeeper's name, not just a business name.
In short, any pornography you buy in the United States that was produced after 1990 has to have, somewhere, a declaration including the name and address of somebody who can prove the performers were over 18 at the time of filming. I don't have a problem with that, in principle. In practice, I don't want to stick my name and home address on adult videos, and I don't have the name and address of anybody else to put on there.
I'm certainly not the only person in this boat, and there exist people who will, for a fee, serve as your "custodian of records", allowing you to put their name and address on your porn, and pledging to maintain the records basically forever. Someday I will need the services of one of these people, but I haven't gotten around to finding one yet.
Fortunately there's an out... 2257 only applies to "actual sexually explicit conduct", which is defined as:
(i) graphic sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex, or lascivious simulated sexual intercourse where the genitals, breast, or pubic area of any person is exhibited;
(ii) graphic or lascivious simulated;
(I) bestiality;
(II) masturbation; or
(III) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or
(iii) graphic or simulated lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person
The only one of these that could even remotely approach my content (so far) is "lascivious exhibition of the genitals", but that vague language has generally been interpreted by the courts to involve content far more graphic than mine.
Okay, that was a little wordy. To make a long story short (too late) I don't need to publish a name and address where my records can be found, so I don't. (I also don't need to actually keep records... but I do anyway.)
As for your second question (why not get a bit more sexual)... be patient. I've got footage on tape right now that goes well beyond what I've published so far. I'll get to it. One of my main goals here is variety... I want to have a variety of girls, a variety of games, a variety of settings, a variety of stories, and a variety of explicitness. Those who prefer to "keep it nice" will find plenty of videos here for them. Those who like to see a little more will get their chance shortly.
Post a Comment